ࡱ>     !#"$%Root Entry F?Τ%__nameid_version1.0(ΤΤ__substg1.0_00020102*0__substg1.0_00030102*0#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFHRSTUVWXYZ[]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuV)MU|  FF  , X-MailerX-DeliveryX-Mimeole!x  ^ __substg1.0_00040102*B__substg1.0_100B0102*__substg1.0_100F0102*__substg1.0_10120102* __substg1.0_10160102*__substg1.0_10170102* __substg1.0_10190102* __substg1.0_001A001E* S^ IPM.NoteTrace loggingSMTP:NBL@SSIPT.COM+nTDennis E. HamiltonSMTPorcmid@email.msn.com__substg1.0_0037001E* __substg1.0_003B0102*  __substg1.0_003D001E* __substg1.0_003F0102*E__substg1.0_0040001E*__substg1.0_00410102* /__substg1.0_0042001E*__substg1.0_00430102*EDennis E. Hamilton+nTnblSMTPnbl@SSIPT.COMnbl+nTDennis E. HamiltonSMTPorcmid@email.msn.comDennis E. HamiltonLF+nTODMA TECH LISTSMTPODMATECH@ftplist.aiim.org__substg1.0_0044001E*__substg1.0_004F0102*T__substg1.0_0050001E*__substg1.0_00510102*ODMA TECH LISTSMTP:ORCMID@EMAIL.MSN.COMSMTP:ORCMID@EMAIL.MSN.COMSMTPnbl@SSIPT.COMTrace loggingSMTPorcmid@email.msn.com__substg1.0_00520102*__substg1.0_0064001E*!__substg1.0_0065001E*__substg1.0_0070001E*__substg1.0_0075001E*__substg1.0_0076001E*__substg1.0_0077001E* __substg1.0_0078001E* !SMTPorcmid@email.msn.comReceived: from rmx11.iname.net - 165.251.8.201 by email.msn.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 3 Feb 2000 01:28:07 -0800 Received: from null (ida05.pub01.mail.com [165.251.32.72]) by rmx11.iname.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA14325 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2000 04:28:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from smv05.mail.com by ida05.pub01 (Version 1.09) for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2000 04:28:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from cerberus.aiim.org (cerberus.aiim.org [198.77.178.66]) by smv05.mail.com (8.9.3/8.9.1SMV2) with ESMTP id EAA04804 for sent by ; Thu, 3 Feb 2000 04:28:02 -0500 (EST) Received: by cerberus.aiim.org; id DAA20667; Thu, 3 Feb 2000 03:40:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from ftplist.aiim.org.178.77.198.in-addr.arpa(198.77.178.140) by cerberus.aiim.org via smap (V5.0) id xma020590; Thu, 3 Feb 00 03:39:36 -0500 Received: from FTPLIST.AIIM.ORG by FTPLIST.AIIM.ORG (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with spool id 0153 for ODMATECH@FTPLIST.AIIM.ORG; Thu, 3 Feb 2000 04:25:03 -0500 Received: from 198.77.178.129 by FTPLIST.AIIM.ORG (SMTPL release 1.0d) with TCP; Thu, 3 Feb 2000 04:25:02 -0500 Received: by cerberus.aiim.org; id DAA20585; Thu, 3 Feb 2000 03:39:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp3.singnet.com.sg(165.21.7.83) by cerberus.aiim.org via smap (V5.0) id xma020576; Thu, 3 Feb 00 03:38:57 -0500 Received: from long (ad202.166.22.150.magix.com.sg [202.166.22.150]) by zinc.singnet.com.sg (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA29458 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2000 17:23:20 +0800 (SGT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000B_01BF6E6B.86A85CC0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Message-ID: <000e01bf6e28$78d90920$6e585858@SSISERVER1> Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 17:24:28 +0800 Reply-To: ODMA TECH LIST Sender: ODMA TECH LIST From: nbl Subject: Trace logging To: ODMATECH@ftplist.aiim.org X-Delivery: Mail.com IDA 1.09 Return-Path: owner-odmatech@ftplist.aiim.org +nTODMA TECH LISTSMTPODMATECH@ftplist.aiim.orgODMA TECH LISTSMTP:ODMATECH@FTPLIST.AIIM.ORGSMTPODMATECH@ftplist.aiim.orgODMATECH@ftplist.aiim.org__substg1.0_0C1E001E*K__substg1.0_0C1F001E*#'L__substg1.0_0E02001E*M__substg1.0_0E03001E*&(N__substg1.0_0E04001E*O__substg1.0_0E1D001E*%-P__substg1.0_1000001E*Q__substg1.0_1013001E**,\yTrace loggingHello, I have a question regarding the trace logging. Currently i have written a dll for ODMA and has been testing it out, and the trace logging is enabled. What i get when i run it on a Win98 pc with Word 2000 and when i run it on a WinNT pc with Word 2000, the result is very different. The log file shows that the several of the functions that are invoked when i run the dll on Win98, are not invoked when i run the dll on WinNT. Is there something wrong with my dll or there's something wrong with Word 2000? The same anomaly happened when i test out the dll on Win95 with Word 97. Anyone has any ideas 'cos i run out mine. Thanks in advance, boon long
Hello,
 
I have a question regarding the trace logging.
 
Currently i have written a dll for ODMA and has been testing it out, and the trace logging is enabled.
 
What i get when i run it on a Win98 pc with Word 2000 and
when i run it on a WinNT pc with Word 2000, the result is very different.
The log file shows that the several of the functions that are invoked when
i run the dll on Win98, are not invoked when i run the dll on WinNT.
 
Is there something wrong with my dll or there's something wrong
with Word 2000?
 
The same anomaly happened when i test out the dll on Win95 with Word 97.
 
Anyone has any ideas 'cos i run out mine.
 
Thanks in advance,
boon long
 
<000e01bf6e28$78d90920$6e585858@SSISERVER1>owner-odmatech@ftplist.aiim.org__substg1.0_1035001E*v-__substg1.0_1046001E*+1w __substg1.0_300B0102*x__substg1.0_8001001E*.0y n` b4YOrcmid's MSN00000001orcmid@email.msn.comMicrosoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200Mail.com IDA 1.09Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200@0]Τ@0]ΤPC__substg1.0_8002001E*z__substg1.0_8003001E*/3{(__substg1.0_8004001E*|__substg1.0_8005001E*24}-__properties_version1.005~p__recip_version1.0_#00000000:7?Τ?Τ__substg1.0_0FF60102*__substg1.0_0FFF0102*69Q &67@9w(n;q?Eq@A/qBCEqDOTqPQqRqdepuvwx}  Fq  q  @m~(ny5-F  0q?o (-=E+nTODMATECH@ftplist.aiim.orgSMTPODMATECH@ftplist.aiim.orgODMATECH@ftplist.aiim.org__substg1.0_3001001E*__substg1.0_3002001E*8;__substg1.0_3003001E*__substg1.0_300B0102*:<SMTPODMATECH@ftplist.aiim.orgSMTP:ODMATECH@FTPLIST.AIIM.ORG Qq000 0qq0__properties_version1.00